The justices differed about whether the toy, shaped like a bottle of Jack Daniel’s, violated the distiller’s trademark rights or was protected by the First Amendment.
By BY ADAM LIPTAK from NYT U.S. https://ift.tt/o5J09Qj
A Chew Toy for Dogs Provokes a Spirited Supreme Court Argument
Trademarks and Trade Names, First Amendment (US Constitution), Dogs, Alcoholic Beverages
The justices differed about whether the toy, shaped like a bottle of Jack Daniel’s, violated the distiller’s trademark rights or was protected by the First Amendment.
By BY ADAM LIPTAK from NYT U.S. https://ift.tt/o5J09Qj
The justices differed about whether the toy, shaped like a bottle of Jack Daniel’s, violated the distiller’s trademark rights or was protected by the First Amendment.
By BY ADAM LIPTAK from NYT U.S. https://ift.tt/o5J09Qj
Posted by Rishav Kumar
0 Comments